Victoria's Secret's Parent Co. and Execs Misled Investors About

Victoria’s Secret’s parent company is facing legal action – not for the bra and underwear designs it is being called out for swiping from ex-employee Jennifer Zuccarini’s label Fleur du Mal – but instead, for allegedly violating federal securities laws by making “materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose adverse information regarding L Brands’ business and prospects,” thereby, causing investors to pay “artificially inflated prices for L Brands common stock,” only to have stock prices fall late last year, and throughout this year, as well. 

Victoria's Secret, Under Siege, Lays Off Employees at Headquarters

Angels' in Hell: The Culture of Misogyny Inside Victoria's Secret

Victoria's Secret's Parent Co. and Execs Misled Investors About Financials, Per New Lawsuit - The Fashion Law

This block used to be for first-time homebuyers. Then global

Sorry, Victoria's Secret, your 'woke' rebrand failed because it

Montreal exec. committee president steps down after investigation

Victoria's Secret parent L Brands (LB) to cut 15% of corporate jobs

Victoria's Secret Billionaire May Step Down From Company: WSJ, NYT

Victoria's Secret ditches wokeness over sexiness after sales drop

Victoria's Secret is reinventing itself. It's a big ask

Fashion Law in 2019: 11 of the Year's Most Noteworthy Lawsuits

Edward Razek, Victoria's Secret Parent's Longtime Marketing Chief

Victoria's Secret Goes Private as L Brands CEO Steps Down

Angels' in Hell: The Culture of Misogyny Inside Victoria's Secret