Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Perclose ProGlide Clinical Evidence

8 Vascular closure devices. a Angio-Seal® (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul

Clinical experience with a novel large bore vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Vascular Closure: the ABC's

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide

Advances and Trends in Vascular Closure Devices

One-year outcomes with two suture-mediated closure devices to achieve access-site haemostasis following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…

Gaetano Pero on LinkedIn: Successful treatment of a severe aortic regurgitation with the…

Vascular News 92 – November 2021 by BIBA Publishing - Issuu